Log in

No account? Create an account
recent cases Bob-Whites closed cases case file old leads old leads new leads new leads
Get Your Politics Out of Our Textbooks - Walking on the Edge
I don't really have a plan...
Get Your Politics Out of Our Textbooks
At first I thought this was a joke or ridiculous rumor, but I should have known better. It turns out to be true.

NY Times: Texas Conservatives Win Curriculum Change

There is so much FAIL in this that I almost get incoherent thinking about it. However:

"@cleolinda RT @txvoodoo: Via @billwhitefortx - email Rick Perry to oppose TX horrible new textbook ideas: http://bit.ly/9mARZt"

Apparently at the very least it is easy to register one's negative opinion of such changes to someone who might be able to fix this ridiculous action on the part of some of our politicians and fellow citizens.

"But you don't live in Texas!" you say. "Why do you care?" Well, because:

a) My family is a family of teachers. I care, as truly good teachers do, about the education of all young people; I value their place in the world, and the choices they will eventually make, and think that it's important for them to receive the most balanced view of our history and political system that we can present, so that they can make their life choices based on understanding and thought, rather than on blind rhetoric. And:

b) I am an attorney. I fully believe in fairness and in knowing all sides of a case before making a decision. This doesn't stop when I'm not considering an actual case. I think it is important in any decision-making. I think it is important for each person. And I think this action of the Texas Board of Education will negatively affect the abilities of those educated with these textbooks to understand all sides of historical or economical events and make decisions accordingly. And:

c) "@cleolinda: Re: TX textbooks: my understanding is that those textbooks will also be used across the country. It does affect you if you're in the U.S." And:

d) Even if that's NOT the case, Texas folk don't STAY in Texas. And people visit Texas. And Texas is one of our 50 states, and a big one, with significant voting power. Each citizen of this country has the power to affect the life and experiences of others, and the power to affect our political future. Do you really want the next generation to go around replying to political discussion or debate with statements like, "Over 200 years of decision-making, beginning with the words of Thomas Jefferson? We don't believe that! Ignore it! Our textbooks tell us there shouldn't be a separation of church and state! So let's vote accordingly!" I mean, really. Our country deserves better than that.

Anyway. If you care about this issue, please do something about it before May, when the Board of Education will take a final vote. One way is to email Governor Perry about it. I did. It's easy. They even have the letter already written, although I added some things at the beginning of mine.

Here is what mine said:

Dear Governor Perry,

As an attorney, as one of a family of educators that has been teaching Americans throughout generations, and as a descendant of some of those who originally signed the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, I am appalled by the recent article I read in the New York Times regarding partisan changes to be made to history and economics textbooks in Texas.


While I have no objection to a balanced history being presented (e.g. positive and negative actions of both conservative and liberal political elements throughout the years) politicians have no business and no right to invade the proper sphere of educators and subject matter experts in order to change the curriculum that will affect future generations by injecting their own political views and angles into that curriculum.

Furthermore, although I myself am a Christian, I do not agree that it is the right of or the proper role for conservative politicians to alter teaching tools such as textbooks just because they, for instance, "reject the notion by the left of a constitutional separation of church and state" (a quote from the article). Whether a politician or member of the community agrees with this "notion" or not, it is the law, upheld by the highest judicial institution in the country, our Supreme Court. If politicians want to see a change in the way the Constitution is applied, or in other policies they do not agree with, the proper sphere for instituting that change is the legal system - NOT school textbooks!

The idea that conservative politicians are ignoring over 200 years of our country's history in order to advance their political views to the younger generation, instead of responsibly presenting history and the state of the law as it is and as it happened, is ludicrous and un-American. One of the main purposes of the particular system of government that was devised by the founders of this country is that it is to act as a system of checks and balances against radical change, allowing for the development of our legal and political system of governance through debate, discussion, and the will of the people as represented by the President, Congress, the judiciary, etc. To represent history, the law, and the government in a way different than it is, just because a politician wants it to look a certain way to the younger generation (e.g. that there is no separation between church and state or shouldn't be) is dishonest, irresponsible to future generations, and not something that should be happening in our educational system. There should be no concern as to whether "Republicans need...credit" for things they've done historically. Teaching children isn't about making sure your political party looks good, it's about ensuring students learn a balanced account of how we got to where we are today, so that they can approach the world from a perspective of understanding how it functions, and then make their own decisions about the part they want to play in it.

The vote by the Texas State Board of Education to change Texas' curriculum standards, led by your appointee for Chair, Gail Lowe, injected politics into our schools. I'm writing to ask you to urge your appointee and the rest of the board to send the proposed changes back to the original curriculum review teams.

These teams -- made up of teachers and subject matter experts -- drafted the original standards, and should review the amendments from the SBOE.

Our childrens' education is not a political game to be influenced by ideologues and partisan politics.

Thank you for urging the chair you appointed to lead the SBOE in reining in the politicization of the curriculum by sending the recent curriculum changes back for review by teachers and subject matter experts.



First Amendment to Post from Texas gal dachelle: "The Texas Freedom Network is a political action group that's fighting the textbook changes. I've donated and signed their petitions."

Second Amendment to Post: Here are a few more articles on the subject:

The Associated Press report.

And Reuters.

And the Dallas Morning News, which Reuters cites as reporting "some fine stuff on this and related subjects."

Please read the "Lasting Impact" section of that last article to see why YOU SHOULD CARE even if you don't live in Texas.

Tags: , , , , ,
Trixie feels: angry angry

18 clues shared or share a clue
dachelle From: dachelle Date: March 27th, 2010 05:49 pm (UTC) (current file)
The Texas Freedom Network is a political action group that's fighting the textbook changes. I've donated and signed their petitions.
foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: March 27th, 2010 10:51 pm (UTC) (current file)
Thanks for the link - added it to the post! :)
queenthesixth From: queenthesixth Date: March 27th, 2010 07:05 pm (UTC) (current file)
Wow, I don't like the sound of that at all. I'm not comfortable with one political party deciding what kids should and shouldn't know about their country.
foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: March 27th, 2010 10:51 pm (UTC) (current file)
Yeah, it's just so many levels of WRONG. Gah.
txvoodoo From: txvoodoo Date: March 27th, 2010 09:28 pm (UTC) (current file)
Thank you! I'm pimping this post.
foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: March 27th, 2010 10:52 pm (UTC) (current file)
Glad to be of any sort of help! I think it's absolutely ridiculous that politicians are not only trying this, but getting away with it.
cleolinda From: cleolinda Date: March 28th, 2010 12:08 am (UTC) (current file)
I had a couple of people show up on Twitter for those posts, to tell me that I was WRONG ON THE INTERNET, so I stopped talking about it for a while.

I kind of want to be like, aren't you ignoring the larger problem here, which is that THEY ARE TAKING IMPORTANT SHIT OUT OF TEXTBOOKS?

(I also had someone thank me for linking to something to do about it, rather than just go "LOL TEXAS." I was like, I'm in Alabama. I feel you.)
foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: March 28th, 2010 02:34 am (UTC) (current file)
Well, that's why I went from a NY Times article. It's a reputable news source.

And there's also the Associated Press.

And Reuters.

And the Dallas Morning News, which Reuters cites as reporting "some fine stuff on this and related subjects."

So if anyone comes to tell me I am WRONG I will be like, "Look, go tell the NY Times they are WRONG. And the AP. And Reuters. I KNOW PEOPLE AT REUTERS. Don't go telling me they make stuff up. Because they don't.

Actually, I think I'll add those other links to the post, too.

oxymoron67 From: oxymoron67 Date: March 28th, 2010 12:24 am (UTC) (current file)
Clearly Jefferson wasn't important in American history. He was only one of the great intellects of the Revolution.

foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: March 28th, 2010 02:40 am (UTC) (current file)
Well, we all know he was just the red-headed stepchild (heh). It's not like he was ever PRESIDENT or anything. Or like he had any writing skills he put to great use to DRAFT THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE.

*hem* Sorry. I was getting angry CAPSLOCK up in my typing again.
chocolate_frapp From: chocolate_frapp Date: March 28th, 2010 01:08 am (UTC) (current file)
situations like this make me glad I don't have kids.
foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: March 28th, 2010 02:41 am (UTC) (current file)
The problem is that it's going to affect everyone, whether we have kids or not - because when we are old and gray? The kids who will be learning from these books will be in our voting population and our government.

(Not that I don't take your point, of course.) :)
o4fuxache From: o4fuxache Date: March 28th, 2010 01:51 am (UTC) (current file)
I've been following this story closely since I first heard about it. As a history teacher, I'm appalled that they're even considering making these changes. I'm glad you posted the link.
foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: March 28th, 2010 02:43 am (UTC) (current file)
What I'm most appalled by is that the changes have made it this far. I just hope the reaction (sent towards the people most able to change this before it's finalized) will be strong enough to stop this from being solidified.

Glad you found this entry helpful. Although I am not a teacher myself, from the bottoms of the hearts of my entire family of teachers, I say, "ROCK ON, TEACHERS." :)
camella From: camella Date: March 28th, 2010 05:43 am (UTC) (current file)
Thanks for sharing this!! Outrageous!
foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: April 15th, 2010 07:39 am (UTC) (current file)
I know!
skyblade From: skyblade Date: March 28th, 2010 09:28 pm (UTC) (current file)
When I first saw the article I thought "Wait, how long have I been out school because I've never seen hip-hop mentioned in textbooks". From what I remember, the history books will give a page to a mass media exploding during its golden age; Your I Love Lucys, your Gone With the Winds, your Elvis Presley's.
foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: April 15th, 2010 07:39 am (UTC) (current file)
Hee! I don't know if I even remember what-all they covered in that regard, actually.
18 clues shared or share a clue