?

Log in

No account? Create an account
recent cases Bob-Whites closed cases case file old leads old leads new leads new leads
Hey, what else can we break? - Walking on the Edge
I don't really have a plan...
foresthouse
foresthouse
Hey, what else can we break?
*takes a break from transcribing*

...

You know, I can honestly say that while I still sincerely doubt I will ever be fearless enough to actually read the books (still convinced that doing so would lower my IQ to the point of no return and scared of ensuing comatose and/or hopeless illiterate state), the Twilight wank is really one of the best things ever. It's the hilarity that keeps on giving!

See Rupert Grint lost a bet with Robert Pattinson and now has to read the Twilight books. I love how it's the punishment for losing the bet.

...

And speaking of hilarity, have I ever mentioned to you what might be one of my favorite euphemisms ever for sex? No? It's "breaking houses," as illustrated in Growing Up Cullen:

(in discussing how in the Twilight series, supposedly, Edward the vampire stayed a virgin for a bazillion years until Bella came along)

welurklate: LIKE WILD SEX ALL OVER THE PLACE AND EDWARD IS....READING
...
welurklate: NO ONE UNDERSTANDS ME!!!!!!
welurklate: reading like flowers for alegeron all pissed off while rose and emmett are breaking houses

HEE.

...

In somewhat related things, Cleolinda on a podcast (Twilight is mentioned, you know, just a bit)

...

And in unrelated things that are still funny, Robert Heinlein's Bizarre Fan Mail Response Letter

Tags: , , , , , ,
Trixie feels: amused amused

9 clues shared or share a clue
Comments
softpaw From: softpaw Date: September 14th, 2008 02:14 am (UTC) (current file)
foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: September 15th, 2008 07:13 pm (UTC) (current file)
Hee! It's really not necessary to read the actual book - the summaries are better.
elfie_chan From: elfie_chan Date: September 14th, 2008 04:43 am (UTC) (current file)
You have read Cleolinda's LJ summary of the books, right? I sporfled and vowed to never, ever read the books or see the movie. EVAR.

The sparkling! Egads!

I've also had a lovely conversation with a couple of teenaged ladies who enjoyed the books, but also agreed with me that the main character is psycho and should not be held up as an example for young ladies. In fact, the girls in question told me, very solemnly, that girls under 12 or so shouldn't read these books, because "they might not be able to tell the difference between fantasy and reality."
apples_juice From: apples_juice Date: September 14th, 2008 07:14 am (UTC) (current file)
Aww, you don't want to go to Shiny Sparkly Vampire Land? *L*
elfie_chan From: elfie_chan Date: September 14th, 2008 04:35 pm (UTC) (current file)
Well, it's no the Shiny Sparkly Vampire Land so much as the Lack of Logic Freaky Teenaged Land.

(Disclaimer: I'm actually very fond of teenagers, and most of them are fabulous people. However, many of them in fiction are freakin' wackos!)
foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: September 15th, 2008 07:14 pm (UTC) (current file)
oh, of course! How do you think I heard of these books? :)

Good for them! Sense from young folks is encouraging. (Of course, that's only TWO young folks - I am sure there are others who might not be so in-touch with reality...)
virginia_belle From: virginia_belle Date: September 15th, 2008 03:52 pm (UTC) (current file)
LOL! I actually did read the books and they are kind of fun in a rather twisted way. The satire is more fun, though. :)

B.
foresthouse From: foresthouse Date: September 15th, 2008 07:15 pm (UTC) (current file)
I...well...maybe I'll read...I...maybe someday. Maybe. *g*
chrryblssmninja From: chrryblssmninja Date: September 16th, 2008 07:01 pm (UTC) (current file)
poor Rupert.
9 clues shared or share a clue